Yemen Monitor
Live · 06:24
Reuters publishes tracking data showing improved LNG tanker traffic in October
This is an archived edition. Go to the latest edition.

Yemen front and the region

New report tracks October recovery in LNG tanker traffic through Hormuz

Reuters published a report on improving LNG tanker traffic through Hormuz in October, citing ship-tracking companies S&P Global Energy and Kpler. These are historical monthly figures, not new transits during this monitoring window or confirmation that navigation is safe now. Most military and humanitarian follow-ups reviewed repeated earlier reporting.

Updated: Amsterdam time Monitoring window: last 1.1 h 2026-11-10 04:15Z → 05:24Z UTC Last search: 2026-11-10 05:28Z

Summary

  • UnverifiedReuters cites S&P Global Energy as recording 31 laden LNG tanker transits in October, up from 23 in September; we have not independently verified the underlying database.
  • UnverifiedKpler counts cargo loadings, a different measure from tanker transits. The figures must not be added together and do not mean Gulf shipping has returned to normal.
  • AttributedReports of five civilians wounded in Taiz and an appeal for hospital fuel predate the window; they were not counted as new injuries or aid deliveries.

Developments in this window

  1. UnverifiedStrait of Hormuz

    Reuters publishes tracking data showing improved LNG tanker traffic in October

    Reuters cited S&P Global Energy as recording 31 laden LNG tankers passing through Hormuz in October, against 23 in September, the highest level since the war began in February. It also cited Kpler as counting 42 cargo loadings in October, up from 27 in September; loadings and tanker transits are different measures. The new development is publication of the report, not these voyages taking place during the window. We have not independently inspected the original tracking databases, and the report does not establish that navigation risks have ended.

Method: we search multiple Arabic and English sources for news published inside the monitoring window only. Older material appears under “Earlier context”. Every item carries its source and publication time. English and Dutch editions are translations of the Arabic edition.

Labels: “Confirmed” = an official body or more than one independent source. “Attributed” = a claim by a party to the conflict, not independently verified. “Disputed” = conflicting accounts. “Unverified” = source text or timing could not be checked.

Scope: 180 headlines scanned, 51 links opened, 31 articles read.

Edition 20261110T0524Z · Permalink · All editions